Greetings, * Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: > Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> writes: > > * Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: > >> Here's a proposed patch along that line. > > > I've back-patched this to 11 (which was just a bit of fuzz) and tested > > it out with a couple of different queries that were causing issues > > previously on the archive server, and they finish in a much more > > reasonable time and react faster to cancel requests/signals. > > Yeah, I'd tried this locally using the data from the one test case you > showed me, and it seemed to fix that.
Good stuff. > > So, looks good to me, and would certainly be nice to get this into the > > next set of releases, so the archive server doesn't get stuck anymore. > > I'll push this tomorrow if nobody has objected to it. Sounds good. > BTW, I had noticed last night that hlFirstIndex is being unreasonably > stupid. Many of the "words" have null item pointers and hence can't > possibly match any query item (I think because we have "words" for > inter-word spaces/punctuation as well as the actual words). Checking > that, as in the attached v2 patch, makes things a bit faster yet. Nice, looks good to me. Thanks! Stephen
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
