On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 10:31:13PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: > Also, I was reminded by Tom's c410af098 about this comment: > > * Further note: At least on some platforms, passing %*s > rather than > * %s to appendStringInfo() is substantially slower, so many > of the > * cases below avoid doing that unless non-zero padding is in > fact > * specified. > > It seems we can remove that hack and avoid its spiriling conditionals. > It's cleaner to make that 0001.
Not sure what 0001 is doing on this thread, so I would suggest to create a new thread for that to attract the correct audience. It is true that we should not need that anymore as we use our own implementation of sprintf now. For now, I have taken 0002 as a base, fixed a couple of things (doc tweaks, removed unnecessary header inclusion, etc.), and committed it, meaning that we are done here. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
