Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> writes:
> ... Another advantage of master-only is a guarantee against
> disrupting time-critical patches.  (It would be ugly to push back branches and
> sort out the master push later, but it doesn't obstruct the mission.)

Hm, doesn't it?  I had the idea that "git push" is atomic --- either all
the per-branch commits succeed, or they all fail.  I might be wrong.

                        regards, tom lane


Reply via email to