Hi, On 2020-08-16 13:31:53 -0700, Andres Freund wrote: > I now luckily have a rr trace of the problem, so I hope I can narrow it > down to the original problem fairly quickly.
Gna, I think I see the problem. In at least one place I wrongly accessed the 'dense' array of in-progress xids using the 'pgprocno', instead of directly using the [0...procArray->numProcs) index. Working on a fix, together with some improved asserts. Greetings, Andres Freund
