On 2020/08/20 17:03, Pierre Giraud wrote:
Can you please show what the plan would look like for?
=# explain (buffers on, summary on, format JSON) select * from t;
With my patch, the following is reported in that case.
=# explain (buffers on, summary on, format JSON) select * from pg_class;
QUERY PLAN
------------------------------------
[ +
{ +
"Plan": { +
"Node Type": "Seq Scan", +
"Parallel Aware": false, +
"Relation Name": "pg_class",+
"Alias": "pg_class", +
"Startup Cost": 0.00, +
"Total Cost": 16.87, +
"Plan Rows": 387, +
"Plan Width": 265, +
"Shared Hit Blocks": 0, +
"Shared Read Blocks": 0, +
"Shared Dirtied Blocks": 0, +
"Shared Written Blocks": 0, +
"Local Hit Blocks": 0, +
"Local Read Blocks": 0, +
"Local Dirtied Blocks": 0, +
"Local Written Blocks": 0, +
"Temp Read Blocks": 0, +
"Temp Written Blocks": 0 +
}, +
"Planning": { +
"Shared Hit Blocks": 103, +
"Shared Read Blocks": 12, +
"Shared Dirtied Blocks": 0, +
"Shared Written Blocks": 0, +
"Local Hit Blocks": 0, +
"Local Read Blocks": 0, +
"Local Dirtied Blocks": 0, +
"Local Written Blocks": 0, +
"Temp Read Blocks": 0, +
"Temp Written Blocks": 0 +
}, +
"Planning Time": 8.132 +
} +
]
(1 row)
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION
