Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@gmail.com> writes:
> Excellent. I'd like to commit these soon, unless someone has a better
> idea for how to name file_utils_febe.c.
As long as it's in src/port or src/common, isn't it implicit that
it's probably FE/BE common code?
I think it'd make more sense to insert all this stuff into file_utils.c,
and then just "#ifdef FRONTEND" the existing code there that doesn't work
in backend. For one thing, that gives us a saner upgrade path whenever
somebody gets ambitious enough to make that code work for the backend.
regards, tom lane
