On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 04:04:22PM +0200, Dmitry Dolgov wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 02, 2020 at 12:50:12PM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote: > > > > > > > Maybe this could be salvaged by flushing 0005 in its current form and > > > > having the jsonb subscript executor do something like "if the current > > > > value-to-be-subscripted is a JSON array, then try to convert the textual > > > > subscript value to an integer". Not sure about what the error handling > > > > rules ought to be like, though. > > > > > > I'm fine with the idea of separating 0005 patch and potentially prusuing > > > it as an independent item. Just need to rebase 0006, since Pavel > > > mentioned that it's a reasonable change he would like to see in the > > > final result. > > > > +1 > > Here is what I had in mind. Worth noting that, as well as the original
This seems to already hit a merge conflict (8febfd185). Would you re-rebase ? -- Justin
