st 30. 9. 2020 v 4:01 odesÃlatel David G. Johnston < david.g.johns...@gmail.com> napsal:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 3:48 PM Alexander Korotkov <aekorot...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> I've skimmed through the thread and checked the patchset. Everything >> looks good, except one paragraph, which doesn't look completely clear. >> >> + <para> >> + This emulates the functionality provided by >> + <xref linkend="sql-createtype"/> but sets the created object's >> + <glossterm linkend="glossary-type-definition">type >> definition</glossterm> >> + to domain. >> + </para> >> >> As I get it states that CREATE DOMAIN somehow "emulates" CREATE TYPE. >> Could you please, rephrase it? It looks confusing to me yet. >> > > v5 attached, looking at this fresh and with some comments to consider. > > I ended up just combining both patches into one. > > I did away with the glossary changes altogether, and the invention of the > new term. I ended up limiting "type's type" to just domain usage but did a > couple of a additional tweaks that tried to treat domains as not being > actual types even though, at least in PostgreSQL, they are (at least as far > as DROP TYPE is concerned - and since I don't have any understanding of the > SQL Standard's decision to separate out create domain and create type I'll > just stick to the implementation in front of me. > +1 Pavel > David J. >
