David Rowley <dgrowle...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 at 06:29, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I'm unsure whether to back-patch either of these. They both seem to be
>> just latent bugs so far as the core code is concerned, but the first one
>> in particular seems like something that could bite extension code.
>> Thoughts?
> That's a good question. I'm leaning towards backpatching both of them.
> The 2nd is new as of v13, so it does not seem unreasonable that
> someone has just not yet stumbled on it with some extension that adds
> extra child ECs. I can imagine a use case for that, by getting rid of
> needless equality quals that duplicate the partition constraint. The
> fix for the first just seems neater/faster/correct, so I can't really
> see any reason not to backpatch it.
Yeah, that's my conclusion too after sleeping on it. Pushed,
thanks for reviewing.
regards, tom lane
