Amit-san, Sawada-san, Thank you for your comment.
> AFAICS, we use name data-type in many other similar stats views like > pg_stat_subscription, pg_statio_all_sequences, pg_stat_user_functions, > pg_stat_all_tables. So, shouldn't we consistent with those views? I checked the data type used for the statistics view identity column. 'Name' type columns are used in many views. If there is no problem with PostgreSQL standard, I would like to change both the data type and the column name. - name type pg_stat_activity.datname pg_stat_replication.usename pg_stat_subscription.subname pg_stat_database.datname pg_stat_database_conflicts.datname pg_stat_all_tables.schemaname/.relname pg_stat_all_indexes.schemaname/.relname/.indexrelname pg_statio_all_tables.schemaname/.relname pg_statio_all_indexes.schemaname/.relname/.indexname pg_statio_all_sequences.schemaname/.relname pg_stat_user_functions.schemaname/.funcname - text type pg_stat_replication_slots.name pg_stat_slru.name pg_backend_memory_contexts.name The attached patch makes the following changes. - column name: name to slot_name - data type: text to name - macro: ... CLOS to ... COLS Regards, Noriyoshi Shinoda -----Original Message----- From: Amit Kapila [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2020 5:52 PM To: Masahiko Sawada <[email protected]> Cc: Shinoda, Noriyoshi (PN Japan A&PS Delivery) <[email protected]>; Dilip Kumar <[email protected]>; Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>; Tomas Vondra <[email protected]>; PostgreSQL Hackers <[email protected]>; Ajin Cherian <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Resetting spilled txn statistics in pg_stat_replication On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 5:41 AM Masahiko Sawada <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 at 23:45, Shinoda, Noriyoshi (PN Japan A&PS > Delivery) <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > As it may have been discussed, I think the 'name' column in > > > pg_stat_replication_slots is more consistent with the column name and > > > data type matched to the pg_replication_slots catalog. > > > The attached patch changes the name and data type of the 'name' column to > > > slot_name and 'name' type, respectively. > > > > It seems a good idea to me. In other system views, we use the name data > > type for object name. When I wrote the first patch, I borrowed the code for > > pg_stat_slru which uses text data for the name but I think it's an > > oversight. > > Hmm, my above observation is wrong. All other statistics use text data > type and internally use char[NAMEDATALEN]. > AFAICS, we use name data-type in many other similar stats views like pg_stat_subscription, pg_statio_all_sequences, pg_stat_user_functions, pg_stat_all_tables. So, shouldn't we consistent with those views? -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
pg_stat_replication_slots_v4.patch
Description: pg_stat_replication_slots_v4.patch
