On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 10:22 AM Daniel Gustafsson <dan...@yesql.se> wrote: > > > On 3 Nov 2020, at 10:05, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: > > > Applied, with the small adjustment of the comma in the docs. > > Thanks! > > > I wonder if we should perhaps backpatch 0002? The changes to sslinfo > > that were ported go all the way back to 9.6, so it should be a safe > > one I think? > > It should be safe given that the code has been in production for a long time. > That being said, sslinfo doesn't have tests (yet) and probably isn't used that > much; perhaps it's best to let this mature in HEAD for a few buildfarm cycles > first?
Yeah, that's a good point. I didn't realize we had no tests for that one, so then it's a bit less safe in that regard. I agree with leaving it for at least one complete buildfarm run before backporting anything. -- Magnus Hagander Me: https://www.hagander.net/ Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/
