Michael Paquier <[email protected]> writes: > I don't think that this is a requirement for this thread, though.
Agreed, I'm not trying to block this patch. Just wishing
there were a better way.
regards, tom lane
Michael Paquier <[email protected]> writes: > I don't think that this is a requirement for this thread, though.
Agreed, I'm not trying to block this patch. Just wishing
there were a better way.
regards, tom lane