Robert Haas <[email protected]> writes:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 10:32 AM Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Adding the expected length to the error message might be OK though.

> Certainly seems like we should do at least that much. The current
> message is just wrong, right?

It's incomplete, for sure.  Doesn't mention nulls either.

                        regards, tom lane


Reply via email to