Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> writes:
> * Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
>> I took a quick look through this. This is just MHO, of course:
>>
>> * I don't think it's okay to change the existing signatures of
>> pg_ls_logdir() et al.
> I disagree that we need to stress over this- we pretty routinely change
> the signature of various catalogs and functions and anyone using these
> is already of the understanding that we are free to make such changes
> between major versions.
Well, like I said, just MHO. Anybody else want to weigh in?
I'm mostly concerned about removing the isdir output of pg_stat_file().
Maybe we could compromise to the extent of keeping that, allowing it
to be partially duplicative of a file-type-code output column.
regards, tom lane
