On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 1:15 PM Jürgen Purtz <juer...@purtz.de> wrote:
> On 30.11.20 20:45, Anastasia Lubennikova wrote: > > As far as I see something got committed and now the discussion is stuck > in arguing about parenthesis. > > FWIW, I think it is a matter of personal taste. Maybe we can compromise > on simply leaving this part unchanged. > > With or without parenthesis is a little more than a personal taste, but > it's a very tiny detail. I'm happy with either of the two variants. > > Sorry, I managed to overlook the most recent patch. I admitted my use of parentheses was incorrect and I don't see anyone else defending them. Please remove them. Minor typos: "the database compare" -> needs an "s" (compares) "In this case, the definition how to compare their rows." -> remove, redundant with the first sentence "The results from the older implicit syntax, and the newer explicit JOIN/ON syntax, are identical" -> move the commas around to what is shown here David J.
