Hi all, Now that the tree has a new set of files for cryptohash functions as of src/common/cryptohash*.c, it is a bit weird to have another file called cryptohashes.c for the set of SQL functions.
Any objections to rename that to cryptohashfuncs.c? That would be much more consistent with the surroundings (cleaning up anythig related to MD5 is on my TODO list). Patch is attached. Thoughts? -- Michael
From d84ccefbf13f44c352d985dd87eadcc998cfb7b9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz>
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 11:02:39 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] Rename cryptohashes.c to cryptohashfuncs.c
---
src/backend/utils/adt/Makefile | 2 +-
src/backend/utils/adt/{cryptohashes.c => cryptohashfuncs.c} | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
rename src/backend/utils/adt/{cryptohashes.c => cryptohashfuncs.c} (98%)
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/adt/Makefile b/src/backend/utils/adt/Makefile
index b4d55e849b..f6ec7b64cd 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/adt/Makefile
+++ b/src/backend/utils/adt/Makefile
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ OBJS = \
bool.o \
cash.o \
char.o \
- cryptohashes.o \
+ cryptohashfuncs.o \
date.o \
datetime.o \
datum.o \
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/adt/cryptohashes.c b/src/backend/utils/adt/cryptohashfuncs.c
similarity index 98%
rename from src/backend/utils/adt/cryptohashes.c
rename to src/backend/utils/adt/cryptohashfuncs.c
index 5de294a7fd..47bc0b3482 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/adt/cryptohashes.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/adt/cryptohashfuncs.c
@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
/*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*
- * cryptohashes.c
+ * cryptohashfuncs.c
* Cryptographic hash functions
*
* Portions Copyright (c) 2018-2020, PostgreSQL Global Development Group
*
*
* IDENTIFICATION
- * src/backend/utils/adt/cryptohashes.c
+ * src/backend/utils/adt/cryptohashfuncs.c
*
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
--
2.29.2
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
