čt 3. 12. 2020 v 7:34 odesílatel Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@gmail.com> napsal: > > Hi hackers, > > I'm looking for more horsepower for testing commitfest entries > automatically, and today I tried out $SUBJECT. The attached is a > rudimentary first attempt, for show-and-tell. If you have a Github > account, you just have to push it to a branch there and look at the > Actions tab on the web page for the results. Does anyone else have > .github files and want to share, to see if we can combine efforts > here? > > The reason for creating three separate "workflows" for Linux, Windows > and macOS rather than three separate "jobs" inside one workflow is so > that cfbot.cputube.org could potentially get separate pass/fail > results for each OS out of the API rather than one combined result. I > rather like that feature of cfbot's results. (I could be wrong about > needing to do that, this is the first time I've ever looked at this > stuff.) > > The Windows test actually fails right now, exactly as reported by > Ranier[1]. It is a release build on a recent MSVC, so I guess that is > expected and off-topic for this thread. But generally, > .github/workflows/ci-windows.yml is the weakest part of this. It'd be > great to get a debug/assertion build, show backtraces when it crashes, > run more of the tests, etc etc, but I don't know nearly enough about > Windows to do that myself. Another thing is that it uses Choco for > flex and bison; it'd be better to find those on the image, if > possible. Also, for all 3 OSes, it's not currently attempting to > cache build results or anything like that.
Any chance to also share links to failing/passing testing builds? > I'm a bit sad that GH doesn't have FreeBSD build runners. Those are > now popping up on other CIs, but I'm not sure if their free/open > source tiers have enough resources for cfbot. > > [1] > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAEudQArhn8bH836OB%2B3SboiaeEcgOtrJS58Bki4%3D5yeVqToxgw%40mail.gmail.com
