Hi Alvaro, On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 23:48 Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
> On 2020-Dec-07, Amit Langote wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 12:05 PM Kyotaro Horiguchi > > <horikyota....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Also, the comment that was in RI_ConstraintInfo now appears in > > > > RI_ConstraintParam, and the new struct (RI_ConstraintInfo) is now > > > > undocumented. What is the relationship between those two structs? I > > > > see that they have pointers to each other, but I think the > relationship > > > > should be documented more clearly. > > > > > > I'm not sure the footprint of this patch worth doing but here is a bit > > > more polished version. > > > > I noticed that the foreign_key test fails and it may have to do with > > the fact that a partition's param info remains attached to the > > parent's RI_ConstraintInfo even after it's detached from the parent > > table using DETACH PARTITION. > > I think this bit about splitting the struct is a distraction. Let's get > a patch that solves the bug first, and then we can discuss what further > refinements we want to do. I think we should get your patch in > CA+HiwqEOrfN9b=f3sdmyspgc4go-l_vmfhxllxvmmdp34e6...@mail.gmail.com > committed (which I have not read yet.) Do you agree with this plan? Yeah, I agree. - Amit > -- Amit Langote EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
