On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 6:24 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > I wrote: > > Having said that, I'm fine with the idea of just marking these > > parallel-restricted in HEAD and ignoring the problem in the back > > branches. > > Hearing no complaints, done that way.
Although I thought that backpatching would be helpful for users who start to use the supported PostgreSQL, I agree not to backpatching since the likelihood that parallel workers execute these functions is low. Thank you for committing the patch! Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada EnterpriseDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com/
