Hi,
Thanks for developing this.
On 2021-01-31 02:11:06 +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> --- a/src/backend/commands/tablespace.c
> +++ b/src/backend/commands/tablespace.c
> @@ -520,15 +520,23 @@ DropTableSpace(DropTableSpaceStmt *stmt)
> * but we can't tell them apart from important data files that
> we
> * mustn't delete. So instead, we force a checkpoint which
> will clean
> * out any lingering files, and try again.
> - *
> - * XXX On Windows, an unlinked file persists in the directory
> listing
> - * until no process retains an open handle for the file. The
> DDL
> - * commands that schedule files for unlink send invalidation
> messages
> - * directing other PostgreSQL processes to close the files.
> DROP
> - * TABLESPACE should not give up on the tablespace becoming
> empty
> - * until all relevant invalidation processing is complete.
> */
> RequestCheckpoint(CHECKPOINT_IMMEDIATE | CHECKPOINT_FORCE |
> CHECKPOINT_WAIT);
> + /*
> + * On Windows, an unlinked file persists in the directory
> listing until
> + * no process retains an open handle for the file. The DDL
> + * commands that schedule files for unlink send invalidation
> messages
> + * directing other PostgreSQL processes to close the files, but
> nothing
> + * guarantees they'll be processed in time. So, we'll also use
> a
> + * global barrier to ask all backends to close all files, and
> wait
> + * until they're finished.
> + */
> +#if defined(WIN32) || defined(USE_ASSERT_CHECKING)
> + LWLockRelease(TablespaceCreateLock);
> +
> WaitForProcSignalBarrier(EmitProcSignalBarrier(PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_SMGRRELEASE));
> + LWLockAcquire(TablespaceCreateLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
> +#endif
> + /* And now try again. */
> if (!destroy_tablespace_directories(tablespaceoid, false))
> {
> /* Still not empty, the files must be important then */
It's probably rare enough to care, but this still made me thing whether
we could avoid the checkpoint at all somehow. Requiring an immediate
checkpoint for dropping relations is quite a heavy hammer that
practically cannot be used in production without causing performance
problems. But it seems hard to process the fsync deletion queue in
another way.
> diff --git a/src/backend/storage/smgr/smgr.c b/src/backend/storage/smgr/smgr.c
> index 4dc24649df..0f8548747c 100644
> --- a/src/backend/storage/smgr/smgr.c
> +++ b/src/backend/storage/smgr/smgr.c
> @@ -298,6 +298,12 @@ smgrcloseall(void)
> smgrclose(reln);
> }
>
> +void
> +smgrrelease(void)
> +{
> + mdrelease();
> +}
Probably should be something like
for (i = 0; i < NSmgr; i++)
{
if (smgrsw[i].smgr_release)
smgrsw[i].smgr_release();
}
Greetings,
Andres Freund
