Greetings, * Alvaro Herrera (alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org) wrote: > On 2021-Feb-05, Mark Rofail wrote: > > I disagree -- I think we should get the second patch in, and consider it > > > a requisite for the other one. > > > > I just want to make sure I got your last message right. We should work on > > adding the <<@ and @>> operators and their GIN logic as a separate patch > > then submit the FKARRAY as a future patch? > > Well, *I* think it makes sense to do it that way. I said so three years > ago :-) > https://postgr.es/m/20180410135917.odjh5coa4cjatz5v@alvherre.pgsql > > > So basically reverse the order of the patches. > > Yeah.
I tend to agree with Alvaro on this, that getting the operators in first makes more sense. > Thanks a lot for your persistence, by the way. +100 Hopefully we'll get this in during this cycle and perhaps then you'll work on something else? :D Great to see a GSoC student continue to work with the community years after the GSoC they participated in. If you'd be interested in being a mentor for this upcoming GSoC season, please let me know! Thanks! Stephen
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
