Ranier Vilela <ranier...@gmail.com> writes:
> Em qui., 11 de fev. de 2021 às 01:46, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> escreveu:
>> At the same time, I think this code could be improved; but the way
>> to do that is to use strtoint(), rather than kluging the choice of
>> datatype even further.

> No matter the function used strtol or strtoint, push_path will remain
> broken with Windows 64bits.

There is quite a lot of difference between "broken" and "my compiler
generates pointless warnings".  Still, I changed it to use strtoint(),
because that's simpler and better style.

                        regards, tom lane


Reply via email to