Alexander Korotkov <[email protected]> writes:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 7:49 PM Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Ugh, no it isn't: even pretty recent clang releases only define
>> __GNUC__ as 4.  It looks like we need a separate test on clang's
>> version.  I looked at their version history and sanitizers seem
>> to have come in around clang 7, so I propose the attached (where
>> I worked a bit harder on the comment, too).

> Looks good to me.  Thank you for revising!

Were you going to push this, or did you expect me to?

                        regards, tom lane


Reply via email to