Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]> writes:
> It looks like the interpretation of these other engines is that [\d-a]
> is the set of \d, the literal character "-", and the literal character
> "a". In other words, the - preceded by \d or \w (or any other character
> class, I guess?) loses its special meaning of identifying a character
> range.
Yeah. While I can see the attraction of being picky about this,
I can also see the attraction of being more compatible with other
engines. Should we relax this?
A quick experiment with perl shows that its opinion is "if the
atom before or after a potentially range-defining dash is a
character class, then take the dash as an ordinary character".
(This confirms Joel's result, and also I found that e.g. [3-\w]
treats the dash as a literal character.)
> This one I didn't understand:
>> ^([\W])$ | pg |
I think Joel just forgot to mark that as ERROR. It certainly
doesn't work in our engine today (though I'm nearly done with
a patch to fix that).
regards, tom lane
