"Joel Jacobson" <[email protected]> writes:
> Having abandoned the cute idea that didn't work,
> here comes a new patch with a regexp_positions() instead returning
> setof record (start_pos integer[], end_pos integer[]).
I wonder if a 2-D integer array wouldn't be a better idea,
ie {{startpos1,length1},{startpos2,length2},...}. My experience
with working with parallel arrays in SQL has been unpleasant.
Also, did you see
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/fc160ee0-c843-b024-29bb-97b5da61971f%40darold.net
Seems like there may be some overlap in these proposals.
regards, tom lane
