On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 9:29 PM Jan Wieck <j...@wi3ck.info> wrote: > > On 3/4/21 2:45 PM, Jacob Champion wrote: > > On Thu, 2021-03-04 at 10:42 +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote: > >> Is there any formal specification for the "a protocol common and very > >> light weight in proxies"? > > > > See > > > > https://www.haproxy.org/download/1.8/doc/proxy-protocol.txt > > > > which is maintained by HAProxy Technologies. > > > > --Jacob > > > > This looks like it would only need a few extra protocol messages to be > understood by the backend. It might be possible to implement that with > the loadable wire protocol extensions proposed here: > > https://commitfest.postgresql.org/32/3018/
Actually the whole point of it is that it *doesn't* need any new protocol messages. And that it *wraps* whatever is there, definitely doesn't replace it. It should equally be wrapping whatever an extension uses. So while the base topic is not unrelated, I don't think there is any overlap between these. -- Magnus Hagander Me: https://www.hagander.net/ Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/
