On 3/8/21 11:23 AM, Ibrar Ahmed wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 7:25 AM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz > <mailto:mich...@paquier.xyz>> wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 03:07:30PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > I think there is enough sustained opposition to this patch that > we can mark > > this as rejected in the commitfest. > > +1. > -- > Michael > > > The patch > (v5-0001-Enable-setting-pg_hba.conf-permissions-from-initd.patch) does > not apply successfully. > There are two reasons first is it was not generated with proper "-p" > which confused cfbot. Second, after > fixing that issue you still need to rebase that. > > > http://cfbot.cputube.org/patch_32_2916.log > <http://cfbot.cputube.org/patch_32_2916.log> > > |+++ doc/src/sgml/ref/initdb.sgml > -------------------------- > No file to patch. Skipping patch. > 1 out of 1 hunk ignored > can't find file to patch at input line 77 > Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? > The text leading up to this was: > > > Can we get a rebase? > > I am marking the patch "Waiting on Author"
What is the point of doing that if we're going to reject the patch as discussed upthread? cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
