About the syncfs patch, my first impression on the guc name sync_after_crash is that it is a boolean type. Not sure about other people's feeling. Do you guys think It is better to rename it to a clearer name like sync_method_after_crash or others?
- Re: fdatasync performance problem with large number of DB fi... Thomas Munro
- Re: fdatasync performance problem with large number of DB fi... Thomas Munro
- Re: fdatasync performance problem with large number of DB fi... Paul Guo
- Re: fdatasync performance problem with large number of DB fi... Thomas Munro
- Re: fdatasync performance problem with large number of DB fi... Fujii Masao
- Re: fdatasync performance problem with large number of DB fi... Paul Guo
- Re: fdatasync performance problem with large number of DB fi... Thomas Munro
- Re: fdatasync performance problem with large number of DB fi... Paul Guo
- Re: fdatasync performance problem with large number of DB fi... Thomas Munro
- Re: fdatasync performance problem with large number of DB fi... Fujii Masao
- Re: fdatasync performance problem with large number of DB fi... Paul Guo
- Re: fdatasync performance problem with large number of DB fi... Thomas Munro
- Re: fdatasync performance problem with large number of DB fi... Fujii Masao
- Re: fdatasync performance problem with large number of DB fi... Bruce Momjian
- Re: fdatasync performance problem with large number of DB fi... Bruce Momjian
- Re: fdatasync performance problem with large number of DB fi... Fujii Masao
- Re: fdatasync performance problem with large number of DB fi... Thomas Munro
- Re: fdatasync performance problem with large number of DB fi... Thomas Munro
- Re: fdatasync performance problem with large number of DB fi... Fujii Masao
- Re: fdatasync performance problem with large number of DB fi... Fujii Masao
- Re: fdatasync performance problem with large number of DB fi... Thomas Munro