On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 2:18 PM houzj.f...@fujitsu.com < houzj.f...@fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > > > I am very interested in this patch, and I plan to do some > > > > experiments with the > > > patch. > > > > Can you please rebase the patch because it seems can not applied to > > > > the > > > master now. > > > > > > Thanks for your interest. > > > > > > I was sitting on a rebased version since the bulk FDW patch will cause > > > conflicts, and since this should maybe be built on top of the table-am > patch > > (2871). > > > Have fun :) > > Hi, > > > > When I testing with the patch, I found I can not use "\d tablename". > > It reports the following error, it this related to the patch? > > Sorry, solved by re-initdb. > > Best regards, > houzj > > > One of the patch (v10-0001-INSERT-SELECT-to-use-BulkInsertState-and-multi_i.patch) from the patchset does not apply. http://cfbot.cputube.org/patch_32_2553.log 1 out of 13 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file src/backend/commands/copyfrom.c.rej It is a minor change, therefore I fixed that to make cfbot happy. Please take a look if that works for you. -- Ibrar Ahmed
v11-0001-INSERT-SELECT-to-use-BulkInsertState-and-multi_i.patch
Description: Binary data
