On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 11:06:55PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > On 2021-Mar-31, Michael Paquier wrote: >> There is already TestLib::check_pg_config(). Shouldn't you leverage >> that with PG_VERSION_NUM or equivalent? > > hmm, I wonder if we shouldn't take the stance that it is not TestLib's > business to be calling any Pg binaries. So that routine should be moved > to PostgresNode.
Hmm. I can see the intention, but I am not sure that this is completely correct either to assume that we require a backend node when tests just do tests with frontends in standalone, aka with TestLib::program_*. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
