On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 5:25 PM Markus Wanner < markus.wan...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> > The last sentences there now seems to relate to just the setting of > "concurrent_abort", rather than the whole reason to invoke the > prepare_cb. And the reference to the "gid" is a bit lost. Maybe: > > "Thus even in case of a concurrent abort, enough information is > provided to the output plugin for it to properly deal with the > <command>ROLLBACK PREPARED</command> once that is decoded." > > Alternatively, state that the gid is otherwise missing earlier in the > docs (similar to how the commit message describes it). > > > I'm fine with Amit's changes and like Markus's last suggestion as well. regards, Ajin Cherian Fujitsu Australia
