On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 01:55:13PM -0300, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> Em seg., 12 de abr. de 2021 às 03:04, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> escreveu:
> > Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> writes:
> > > On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 07:42:20PM -0300, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> > >> Em dom., 11 de abr. de 2021 às 16:25, Justin Pryzby <
> > pry...@telsasoft.com>
> > >>> I think it's cleanest to write:
> > >>> |HeapTupleData tmptup = {0};
> >
> > > I agree that this would be cleaner.
> >
> > It would be wrong, though, or at least not have the same effect.
> >
> I think that you speak about fill pointers with 0 is not the same as fill
> pointers with NULL.
>
>
> > ItemPointerSetInvalid does not set the target to all-zeroes.
> >
> ItemPointerSetInvalid set or not set the target to all-zeroes?
I think Tom means that it does:
BlockIdSet(&((pointer)->ip_blkid), InvalidBlockNumber),
(pointer)->ip_posid = InvalidOffsetNumber
but it's not zero, as I thought:
src/include/storage/block.h:#define InvalidBlockNumber ((BlockNumber)
0xFFFFFFFF)
> > (Regardless of that detail, it's generally best to accomplish
> > objective X in the same way that existing code does. Deciding
> > that you have a better way is often wrong, and even if you
> > are right, you should then submit a patch to change all the
> > existing cases.)
FYI, I'd gotten the idea from here:
$ git grep 'HeapTupleData.*='
src/backend/executor/execTuples.c: HeapTupleData tuple = {0};
--
Justin
