On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 12:22 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > "tsunakawa.ta...@fujitsu.com" <tsunakawa.ta...@fujitsu.com> writes: > > From: Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> > >> No. You'd have to be superuser anyway to do that, and we're not in the > >> habit of trying to put training wheels on superusers. > > > Understood. However, we may add the parallel safety member in > > fmgr_builtins[] in another thread for parallel INSERT SELECT. I'd > > appreciate your comment on this if you see any concern. > > [ raised eyebrow... ] I find it very hard to understand why that would > be necessary, or even a good idea. Not least because there's no spare > room there; you'd have to incur a substantial enlargement of the > array to add another flag. But also, that would indeed lock down > the value of the parallel-safety flag, and that seems like a fairly > bad idea. >
I'm curious. The FmgrBuiltin struct includes the "strict" flag, so that would "lock down the value" of the strict flag, wouldn't it? Regards, Greg Nancarrow Fujitsu Australia
