Nitin Jadhav <nitinjadhavpostg...@gmail.com> writes:
> Thanks for the explanation. I also feel that we may not support every
> case-variant. But the other reason which triggered me to think in the
> other way is, as mentioned in commit [1] where this feature was added,
> says that these format patterns are compatible with Oracle. Whereas
> Oracle supports both upper case and lower case patterns. I just wanted
> to get it confirmed with this point before concluding.
Hm. If Oracle does that, then there's an argument for us doing it
too. I can't get hugely excited about it, but maybe someone else
cares enough to prepare a patch.
regards, tom lane
