On Mon, 17 May 2021 at 17:18, Tatsuo Ishii <is...@sraoss.co.jp> wrote: > > > On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 09:33:27AM +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote: > >> Me too. Let's backpatch. > > > > A README is not directly user-facing, it is here for developers, so I > > would not really bother with a backpatch. Now it is not a big deal to > > do so either, so that's not a -1 from me, more a +0, for "please feel > > free to do what you think is most adapted". > > I think README is similar to code comments. If a code comment is > wrong, we usually fix to back branches. Why can't we do the same thing > for README?
Thanks for the votes. Since Michael was on the fence and I was just leaning over it and Ishii-san was pro-backpatch, I backpatched it. > > You may want to hold on until 14beta1 is tagged, though. > > Of course we can wait till that day but I wonder why. I imagined that would be a good idea for more risky patches so we don't break something before a good round of buildfarm testing. However, since this is just a README, I didn't think it would have mattered. Maybe there's another reason I'm overlooking? David
