Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 11:25 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Checking the git history, this was fixed in f560209c6, which also
>> included some other mostly-cosmetic cleanup. I'm inclined to
>> propose back-patching that whole commit, rather than allowing the
>> code in exec_replication_command() to diverge in different branches.
>> It looks like it applies cleanly as far back as v10. Maybe something
>> could be done for 9.6 as well, but since that branch is so close to
>> EOL, I doubt it's worth spending extra effort on it.
> +1.
Done that way.
regards, tom lane
