> specifically about history files being given higher priority for > archiving. If we go with this change then we'd at least want to rewrite > or remove those comments, but I don't actually agree that we should > remove that preference to archive history files ahead of WAL, for the > reasons brought up previously.
> As was suggested on that subthread, it seems like it should be possible > to just track the current timeline and adjust what we're doing if the > timeline changes, and we should even know what the .history file is at > that point and likely don't even need to scan the directory for it, as > it'll be the old timeline ID. I agree, I missed this part. The .history file should be given higher preference. I will take care of it in the next patch. Thanks, Dipesh
