On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 5:19 PM John Naylor <john.nay...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Side note for future reference: While the feature named in the CF entry has > been rejected, the remaining 0001 patch currently proposed no longer matches > the title, or category. It is possible within the CF app, and helpful, to > rename the entry when the scope changes. > > The proposed patch in the CF for incremental view maintenance [1] does some > refactoring of its own in implementing the feature. I don't think it makes > sense to commit a refactoring that conflicts with that, while not necessarily > making life easier for that feature. Incremental view maintenance is highly > desirable, so I don't want to put up unnecessary roadblocks.
Thanks. I'm okay to close the CF entry(https://commitfest.postgresql.org/33/2928/) and stop this thread. Regards, Bharath Rupireddy.
