On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 10:29 AM Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@gmail.com> wrote: > For comparison, here is my sketch of idea #1. I pick an arbitrary > value to use as PG_O_DIRECT (I don't want to define O_DIRECT for fear > of breaking other code that might see it and try to pass it into > open()... for all I know, it might happen to match OS-internal value > O_NASAL_DEMONS), and statically assert that it doesn't collide with > standard flags we're using, and I strip it out of the flags I pass in > to open(). As I said, a bit icky, but it's a tiny and localised > patch, which is nice.
I'm planning to go with that idea (#1), if there are no objections.
