On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 6:09 PM Amit Langote <amitlangot...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 10:56 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 6:27 PM Amit Langote <amitlangot...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Actually, I found a big hole in my assumptions around deferrable > > > foreign constraints, invalidating the approach I took in 0002 to use a > > > query-lifetime tuplestore to record root parent tuples. I'm trying to > > > find a way to make the tuplestore transaction-lifetime so that the > > > patch still works. > > > > > > In the meantime, I'm attaching an updated set with 0001 changed per > > > your comments. > > > > 0001 patch conflicts with 71f4c8c6f74. Could you please rebase the > patchset? > > Thanks for the heads up. > > I still don't have a working patch to address the above mentioned > shortcoming of the previous approach, but here is a rebased version in > the meantime. > > > -- > Amit Langote > EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com > @Amit patch is not successfully applying, can you please rebase that. Masahiko Sawada, it's been a bit long since you reviewed the patch, are you still interested to review that? -- Ibrar Ahmed
