Em ter., 20 de jul. de 2021 às 11:15, David Rowley <dgrowle...@gmail.com> escreveu:
> On Tue, 20 Jul 2021 at 10:04, Ranier Vilela <ranier...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Perhaps you would agree with me that in the most absolute of times, > malloc will not fail. > > So it makes more sense to test: > > if (ret != NULL) > > than > > if (ret == NULL) > > I think it'd be better to use unlikely() for that. > Sure, it can be, but in this case, there is no way to reduce the scope. regards, Ranier Vilela
