On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 9:38 AM Greg Nancarrow <gregn4...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 1:42 PM houzj.f...@fujitsu.com > <houzj.f...@fujitsu.com> wrote: > > > > Personally, the new name pg_publication_sch is not very easy to understand. > > (Maybe it's because I am not a native english speaker. If others feel ok, > > please ignore this comment) > > > > I was actually thinking the same thing. > I prefer the full SCHEMA/schema, even for all the internal > variables/definitions which have been changed since the last patch > version. > I think Vignesh was trying to be consistent with pg_publication_rel > and pg_subscription_rel, but maybe "rel" is better understood to be an > abbreviation for "relation" than "sch" for "schema"? > Thoughts from others?
I have changed it to pg_pubication_schema as earlier as both you and Houzj San felt pg_publication_schema was better. This is fixed in the v14 patch attached at [1]. [1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CALDaNm3DTj535ezfmm8QHLOtOkcHF2ZcCfSjfR%3DVbTbLZXFRsA%40mail.gmail.com Regards, Vignesh