On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 12:11 PM Mark Dilger <mark.dil...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > A superuser-only GUC for this is also a bit too heavy handed.
Yeah, but you're inventing a system for allowing the restriction on a GUC to be something other than is-superuser in the very patch we're talking about. So it could be something like is-database-security. Therefore I don't grok the objection. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
