On Sat, Jul 31, 2021 at 2:39 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Here, the test is expecting 2 prepared transactions corresponding to
> two subscriptions but it waits for just one subscription via
> appname_copy. It should wait for the second subscription using
> $appname as well.
>
> What do you think?

I agree with this analysis. The test needs to wait for both
subscriptions to catch up.
Attached is a patch that addresses this issue.

regards,
Ajin Cherian
Fujitsu Australia

Attachment: v1-0001-Fix-possible-failure-in-021_twophase-tap-test.patch
Description: Binary data

Reply via email to