On Wed, 4 Aug 2021 at 02:10, Tomas Vondra <tomas.von...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > I did run the same set of benchmarks as for Slab, measuring some usual > allocation patterns. The results for i5-2500k machine are attached (for > the xeon it's almost exactly the same behavior). While running those > tests I realized the last patch is wrong and sets allocChunkLimit=1, > which is bogus and causes significant regression. So here's an updated > version of the patch series too.
I know you're not done with these yet, but FWIW, I was getting an Assert failure with these patches on: Assert(total_allocated == context->mem_allocated); It seems to be because you've forgotten to ignore keeper blocks when adjusting context->mem_allocated in GenerationReset() David
