> On Aug 8, 2021, at 3:28 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Cool, thanks. I also tried your millions-of-random-regexps script > and didn't find any difference between the results from HEAD and > those from the v3 patch. The patch looks ready to commit. I don't expect to test it any further unless you have something in particular you'd like me to focus on. Thanks again for working on this. — Mark Dilger EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
- Another regexp performance improvement: skip useless paren-... Tom Lane
- Re: Another regexp performance improvement: skip usele... Andrew Dunstan
- Re: Another regexp performance improvement: skip u... Tom Lane
- Re: Another regexp performance improvement: sk... Mark Dilger
- Re: Another regexp performance improvement... Tom Lane
- Re: Another regexp performance improv... Mark Dilger
- Re: Another regexp performance im... Tom Lane
- Re: Another regexp performanc... Mark Dilger
- Re: Another regexp performanc... Tom Lane
- Re: Another regexp performanc... Mark Dilger
- Re: Another regexp performanc... Tom Lane
- Re: Another regexp performanc... Mark Dilger
- Re: Another regexp performanc... Tom Lane
- Re: Another regexp performanc... Tom Lane
- Re: Another regexp performanc... Tom Lane
- Re: Another regexp performanc... Mark Dilger
- Re: Another regexp performanc... Mark Dilger
- Re: Another regexp performanc... Tom Lane
- Re: Another regexp performanc... Mark Dilger
- Re: Another regexp performanc... Mark Dilger