On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 12:53 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Yeah, I prefer my original patch over this idea. On the other hand, I > can see the point of review comment on it that Amit pointed out[1]. > > Regards, > > [1] > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAA4eK1KaWwUSkDEKPseVY-z00kQJfpfVFdJCXPv9_CrwVZPMhg%40mail.gmail.com >
Personally, I don't really think the wording that results from the original patch is great, because it doesn't give the impression of multiple options. I prefer something like: Additionally, refresh options may be specified, as described under <literal>REFRESH PUBLICATION</literal> supported <replaceable>refresh_option</replaceable> values, except in the case of <literal>DROP PUBLICATION</literal>. Regards, Greg Nancarrow Fujitsu Australia