On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 10:34 AM Peter Geoghegan <p...@bowt.ie> wrote:
> It would be a lot clearer if the "buffer usage" line was simply moved > down. I think that it should appear after the lines that are specific > to the table's indexes -- just before the "avg read rate" line. That > way we'd group the buffer usage output with all of the other I/O > related output that summarizes the VACUUM operation as a whole. > The last two lines are also "*** usage" -- shouldn't the buffer numbers be next to them?
