On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 03:59:49PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > > On 26 Aug 2021, at 15:43, Julien Rouhaud <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Le jeu. 26 août 2021 à 21:38, Daniel Gustafsson <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> a écrit : > > > On 26 Aug 2021, at 15:09, Bruce Momjian <[email protected] > > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > > Basically, pg_upgrade has avoided any backend changes that could be > > > controlled by GUCs and I am not sure we want to start adding such > > > changes for just this. > > > > In principle I think it’s sound to try to avoid backend changes where > > possible > > without sacrificing robustness. > > > > I agree, but it seems quite more likely that an extension relying on a > > bgworker changes this guc, compared to an extension forcing autovacuum to > > be on for instance. > > Agreed, in this particular case I think there is merit to the idea of > enforcing > it in the backend.
OK, works for me -- Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.
