>> >> > My 0.02€: From a benchmarking perspective, ISTM that it makes sense to >> >> > include disconnection times, which are clearly linked to connections, >> >> > especially with -C. So I'd rather have the more meaningful figure even >> >> > at the price of a small change in an undocumented feature. >> >> >> >> +1. The aim of -C is trying to measure connection overhead which >> >> naturally includes disconnection overhead. >> > >> > I think it is better to measure disconnection delays when -C is specified >> > in >> > pg 14. This seems not necessary when -C is not specified because pgbench >> > just >> > reports "initial connection time". >> >> Ok. >> >> > However, what about pg13 or later? Do you think we should also change the >> > behavior of pg13 or later? If so, should we measure disconnection delay >> > even >> > when -C is not specified in pg13? >> >> You mean "pg13 or before"? > > Sorry, you are right. I mean "pg13 or before".
I would think we should leave as it is for pg13 and before to not surprise users. -- Tatsuo Ishii SRA OSS, Inc. Japan English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp
